[1] Krawinkler H, Seneviranta GDPK (1998) Pros and cons of a pushover analysis of seismic performance evaluation, Engineering structures 20: 452-464.

[2] Nuray Aydinoglu M, Gokturk Onem (2010) Evaluation of analysis procedures for seismic assessment and retrofit design, Erathquake Engineering in Europe Springer: Chapter 8: 171-198.

[3] American Society of Civil Engineers, Minimum Design Loads For Building and Other Structures. 2010.

[4] European Committee for Standardization. Euro Code 8, Design Of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, 2003.

[5] Spacone E, Camata G, Faggella M (2009) Nonlinear models and nonlinear procedures for seismic analysis of reinforced concrete frame structures. Computational structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, Taylor  & Francis Group, Chapter 21: 323-345.

[6] Reyes JC, Chopra AK (2011) Evaluation of three dimensional modal pushover analysis for unsymmetric-plan buildings subjected to two components of ground motion. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics. Volume 40, Issue 13, pages 1475–1494

[7] Faella G, Kilar V (1998) Asymmetric multistorey R/C frame structures: push-over versus nonlinear dynamic analysis. 11th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam.

[8] Moghadam AS, Tso WK (2000) 3-D Pushover analysis for damage assessment of buildings. JSEE 2(3): 23-31.

[9] Fajfar PA (2000) Nonlinear analysis method for performance based seismic design. Earthquake Spectra 16(3): 573-592.

[10] Chopra AK, Goel RK (2002) A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics 31: 561-582.

[11] Elnashai AS (2001) Advanced inelastic static (Pushover) analysis for earthquake applications. Structural Engineering and mechanics 12(1): 51-69.

[12] Fajfar P, Marusic Damjan, Perus Iztok (2005) Torsional effects in the pushover-based seismic analysis of buildings. Journal of Earthquake engineering 9: 831-854.

[13] Chopra AK, Goel RK (2004) A modal pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic demands for unsymmetric-plan buildings. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics 33: 903-927.

[14] Goel RK, Chopra AK (2005) Exension of modal pushover analysis to compute member forces. Earthquake Spectra 21(1): 125-140.

[15] Reyes JC, Chopra AK (2011) Three-dimensional modal pushover analysis of buildings subjected to two components of ground motion, including its evaluation for tall buildings. Earthquake engineering and structural dynamics 40: 789-806.

[16] Antoniou S, Pinho R (2004) Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure. Journal of earthquake engineering 8(5): 643-661.

[17] Papanikolaou VK, Elnashai AS, Pareja JF (2006) Evaluation of conventional  and adaptive  pushover analysis II: comparative  results. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 10: 127–151.

[18] American Concrete Institute, ACI 318-08, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, 2008.

[19] SismoStruct: Computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of frame structures, www.seismosoft.com, 2010.

[20] Fragiadakis M, Papadrakakis M (2008) Modeling, analysis and reliability of seismically excited structures: computational issues. International journal of computational methods 5(4): 483-511.

[21] Elnashai AS (2008) Fundamental of earthquake engineering, John wiley and sons.

[22] Applied Technology Council, Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures, FEMA 440, 2005.