A Preliminary Assessment of Rock Slope Stability in Tropical Climates: A Case Study at Lafarge Quarry, Perak, Malaysia | ||
| Journal of Mining and Environment | ||
| مقاله 2، دوره 11، شماره 3، مهر 2020، صفحه 661-673 اصل مقاله (18.98 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22044/jme.2020.9814.1901 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| K.S. Shah؛ M. H. Mohd Hashim* ؛ K.S. Ariffin؛ N. F. Nordin | ||
| Strategic Mineral Niche, School of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia | ||
| چکیده | ||
| The stability analysis of rock slopes is a complex task for the geotechnical engineers due to the complex nature of the rock mass in a tropical climate that often has discontinuities in several forms, and consequently, in several types of slope failures. In this work, a rock mass classification scheme is followed in a tropical environment using the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) and Geological Strength Index (GSI) combined with the kinematic investigation using the Rocscience Software Dips 6.0. The Lafarge quarry is divided into ten windows. In the RMR system, the five parameters uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), rock quality designation (RQD), discontinuity spacing, discontinuity condition, and groundwater conditions are investigated. The RMR values range from 51 to 70 (fair to good rock mass), and the GSI values range from 62 to 65 (good to fair rock mass). There is a good and positive correlation between RMR and GSI. The kinematic analysis reveals that window A is prone to critical toppling, window H to critical wedge-planar failure, and window G to critical wedge failure. From the results obtained, it can be concluded that the kinematic analysis combined with the rock mass classification system provides a better understanding to analyze the rock slope stability in a tropical climate compared with considering the rock mass classification system individually. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Slope stability؛ Rock mass rating؛ Rock mass classification؛ Geological strength index؛ Kinematic analysis | ||
|
سایر فایل های مرتبط با مقاله
|
||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1]. Basahel, H. and H. Mitri. (2017). Application of rock mass classification systems to rock slope stability assessment: a case study. Journal of rock mechanics and geotechnical engineering. 9 (6): p. 993-1009. [2]. Abdullah, R.A. (2018). Slope Stability Analysis Of Quarry Face at Karang Sambung District, Central Java, Indonesia. International Journal Of Civil Engineering & Technology (IJCIET). 9 (1): p. 857-864. [3]. Hoek, E. (2000). Practical rock engineering. [4]. Huang, Y.H. (Year). Slope stability analysis by the limit equilibrium method: Fundamentals and methods. of Conference.: American Society of Civil Engineers. [5]. Liu, S., L. Shao, and H. Li. (2015). Slope stability analysis using the limit equilibrium method and two finite element methods. Computers and Geotechnics. 63: p. 291-298. [6]. Pasternack, S. and S. Gao. (1988),. Numerical methods in the stability analysis of slopes. Computers & Structures. 30 (3): p. 573-579. [7]. Sharma, M. (2019). Analysis of Slope Stability of road cut Slopes of Srinagar, Uttrakhand, India. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research. 14 (3): p. 609-615. [8]. Umrao, R. (2011). Stability analysis of cut slopes using continuous slope mass rating and kinematic analysis in Rudraprayag district, Uttarakhand. Geomaterials. 1 (03): p. 79. [9]. Pan, P.-Z. (2019). Modeling of an excavation-induced rock fracturing process from continuity to discontinuity. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements. 106: p. 286-299. [10]. Duran, A. and K. Douglas. (Year). Experience with empirical rock slope design. in ISRM International Symposium. of Conference.: International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. [11]. Hoek, E. (2007). Rock mass properties. Practical rock engineering: p. 190-236. [12]. Hack, R., D. Price, and N. Rengers. (2003). A new approach to rock slope stability–a probability classification (SSPC). Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 62 (2): p. 167-184. [13]. Bieniawski, Z. (1993). Classification of rock masses for engineering: the RMR system and future trends, in Rock Testing and Site Characterization. Elsevier. p. 553-573. [14]. Pantelidis, L. (2009). Rock slope stability assessment through rock mass classification systems. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 46 (2): p. 315-325. [15]. Wyllie, D.C. and C. Mah. (2014). Rock slope engineering. CRC Press. [16]. Mohamed, A.I. and A.F. Bayram. (2020). Utilizing a geomechanical classification to preliminary analysis of rock slope stability along roadway d340-41.42, southwest of Turkey: A case study. Turkish Journal of Engineering. 4 (1): p. 9. [17]. Ansari, T.A., K.M. Sharma. and T. Singh. (2019). Empirical Slope Stability Assessment Along the Road Corridor NH-7, in the Lesser Himalayan. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering. 37 (6): p. 5391-5407. [18]. Sujatha, E.R. and V. Thirukumaran. (2018). Rock slope stability assessment using geomechanical classification and its application for specific slopes along Kodaikkanal-Palani Hill Road, Western Ghats, India. Journal of the Geological Society of India. 91 (4): p. 489-495. [19]. Bieniawski, Z. (1973). Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Civil Engineer in South Africa. 15(12). [20]. Hoek, E. and E.T. Brown. (1980). Empirical strength criterion for rock masses. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering. 106 (ASCE 15715). [21]. Marinos, P. and E. Hoek. (Year), GSI: a geologically friendly tool for rock mass strength estimation. in ISRM international symposium. of Conference.: International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. [22]. Hoek, E. and E.T. Brown. (1997). Practical estimates of rock mass strength. International journal of rock mechanics and mining sciences. 34 (8): p. 1165-1186. [23]. Hoek, E., P. Marinos. and M. Benissi. (1998). Applicability of the Geological Strength Index (GSI) classification for very weak and sheared rock masses. The case of the Athens Schist Formation. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment. 57 (2): p. 151-160. [24]. Hoek, E. (1999). Putting numbers to geology—an engineer's viewpoint. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology. 32 (1): p. 1-19. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 548 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 828 |
||
