Challenges for In-Situ Stress Measurement in Rock Caverns by Hydraulic Fracturing and HTPF Tests-Case Study: Azad Hydropower Project | ||
| Journal of Mining and Environment | ||
| مقاله 17، دوره 12، شماره 2، تیر 2021، صفحه 529-545 اصل مقاله (12.06 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Case Study | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22044/jme.2021.10673.2037 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| M. R. Shahverdiloo* ؛ Sh. Zare | ||
| Faculty of Mining, Petroleum and Geophysics Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Hydraulic fracturing (HF) and hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF) are efficient hydraulic methods in order to determine the in-situ stress of rock mass. Generally, the minimum (Sh) and maximum (SH) horizontal principal stresses are measured by hydraulic methods; the vertical stress (SV) is calculated by the weight of the overburden layers. In this work, 37 HF and HTPF tests are conducted in a meta-sandstone, which has about 10% inter-layer phyllite. The artesian circumstance, considerable gap between the drilling and hydraulic tests in the long borehole, no underground access tunnel to rock cavern at the early stages of projects, and a simplified hypothesis theory of HF are the main challenges and limitations of the HF/HTPF measurements. Due to the instability in the long borehole, the drill rig type and borehole length are revised; also TV logger is added to the process of selection of the test’s deep. The HF/HTPF data is sequentially analyzed by the classic and inversion methods in order to achieve an optimum number of hydraulic tests. Besides, The SH magnitude in the inversion method is lower than the classic method; the relevant geological data and the faulting plan analysis lead to validate the SH and Sh magnitudes and the azimuths obtained by the classic method. The measured SH and Sh magnitudes are 7-17 MPa and 4-11 MPa, respectively; the calculated vertical stress magnitude is 6-14 MPa at the test locations. Indeed, the stress state is (SH > SV > Sh), and SH azimuth range is 56-93 degrees. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Stress Measurement؛ Stress State؛ Hydraulic Fracturing؛ HTPF؛ Heterogeneity | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1]. Abdollahipour, A., Fatehi, M.M., Yarahmadi, B.A. and Gholamnejad, J. (2016). Numerical investigation of effect of crack geometrical parameters on hydraulic fracturing process of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Journal of Mining and Environment, Vol.7, No.2, 2016, 205-214.
[2]. Amadei, B., and Stephansson, O. (1997). Rock stress and its measurement. Springer Science and Business Media.
[3]. Alemdag, S., Zeybek, H.I., and Kulekci, G. (2019). Stability evaluation of the Gümüşhane-Akçakale cave by numerical analysis method. Journal of Mountain Science. 16 (9): 2150-2158.
[4]. ASTM D 4645 2008. Standard Test Method for Determination of In-Situ Stress in Rock Using Hydraulic Fracturing Method, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Philadelphia, PA.
[5]. Bakhshi, E., Rasouli, V., Ghorbani, A., Marji, M.F., Damjanac, B. and Wan, X. (2019). Lattice numerical simulations of lab-scale hydraulic fracture and natural interface interaction. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 52 (5): 1315-1337.
[6]. Bai, X., Zhang, D.M., Wang, H., Li, S.J. and Rao, Z. (2018). A novel in situ stress measurement method based on acoustic emission Kaiser effect: a theoretical and experimental study. Royal Society open science. 5 (10): 181263.
[7]. Cornet, F.H. and Valette, B. (1984). In situ stress determination from hydraulic injection test data. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. 89 (B13): 11527-11537.
[8]. Cornet, F.H. (1986, August). Stress determination from hydraulic tests on preexisting fractures-the
HTPF method. In ISRM International Symposium. OnePetro.
[9]. Cornet, F.H. (1993). The HTPF and the integrated stress determination methods. In Rock testing and site characterization (pp. 413-432). Pergamon.
[10]. Cornet, F.H., Li, L., Hulin, J.P., Ippolito, I., and Kurowski, P. (2003). The hydro-mechanical behavior of a fracture: an in situ experimental case study. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 40 (7-8): 1257-1270.
[11]. Feng, Yu. Harrison, John P. and Bozorgzadeh, N. 2019. Uncertainty in In-situ Stress Estimations: A Statistical Simulation to Study the Effect of Numbers of Stress Measurements, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 52, pages 5071–5084.
[12]. GK-Gamaneh Kav Co. 2015. Azad PSPP final report of hydraulic fracturing.
[13]. Gaines, S., Diederichs, M.S. and Hutchinson, D.J. (2012). Review of borehole in situ stress measurement techniques for various ground conditions and numerical stress estimation considerations. In 46th US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association.
[14]. Haimson, B. and Fairhurst, C. (1970). Hydraulic fracturing in porous-permeable materials. Journal of Petroleum Technology. 21 (07): 811-817.
[15]. Haimson, B. and Fairhurst, C. (1969). In-situ stress determination at great depth by means of hydraulic fracturing. In The 11th US symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association.
[16]. Haimson, B.C. 1989. Hydraulic fracturing stress measurements, special issue, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 26: 447–685.
[17]. Haimson, B.C., and Cornet, F.H. 2003, ISRM suggested methods for rock stress estimation—part 3: hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF). International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 40 (7-8): 1011-1020.
[18]. Haimson, B.C. and Lee, M. Y. (1984). Development of a wireline hydro-fracturing technique and its use at a site of induced seismicity. In The 25th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association.
[19]. Huan, X., Xu, G., Zhang, Y., Sun, F. and Xue, S. (2021). Study on Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Coupling and the Stability of a Geothermal Wellbore Structure. Energies. 14 (3): 649.
[20]. Hubbert, M.K. and Willis, D.G. (1957). Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. Transactions of the AIME. 210 (01): 153-168.
[21]. Hudson, J.A., Cornet, F.H. and Christiansson, R. (2003). ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress Estimation-Part 1: Strategy for rock stress estimation. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 40 (7-8): 991-998.
[22]. Hudson, A. 1995. Comprehensive rock engineering- Rock Testing and Site Characterization-Principles, Practice and Projects, chapter 15, page: 413-431.
[23]. Hung, J.H., Ma, K.F., Wang, C.Y., Ito, H., Lin, W. and Yeh, E.C. (2009). Subsurface structure, physical properties, fault-zone characteristics and stress state in scientific drill holes of Taiwan Chelungpu Fault Drilling Project. Tectonophysics. 466 (3-4): 307-321.
[24]. Ji, M. and Guo, H. (2020). Influence of in-situ rock stress on the stability of roadway surrounding rock: a case study. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering. 17 (1): 138-147.
[25]. Kehle, R.O. (1964). The determination of tectonic stresses through analysis of hydraulic well fracturing. Journal of Geophysical Research. 69 (2): 259-273.
[26]. Kim, K. and Franklin, J. (1987). Suggested methods for rock stress determination. In International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts (Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 53-73.
[27]. Krietsch, H., Gischig, V., Jalali, M.R., Amann, F., Evans, K.F., Doetsch, J. and Valley, B. (2017). Stress measurements in crystalline rock: Comparison of overcoring, hydraulic fracturing and induced seismicity results. In 51st US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium. American Rock Mechanics Association.
[28]. Lakirouhani, A., Detournay, E., and Bunger, A.P. (2016). A reassessment of in situ stress determination by hydraulic fracturing. Geophysical Journal International. 205 (3): 1859-1873.
[29]. Lan, Q., Zhen-hua, X., Kui, Z., Yuan, L., Yang, L., Ke-jia, W., and Hui, C. (2011). Study on acoustic emission in-situ stress measurement techniques based on plane stress condition. Procedia Engineering. 26: 1473-1481.
[30]. Li, H., Lin, B., Hong, Y., Gao, Y., Yang, W., Liu, T. and Huang, Z. (2017). Effects of in-situ stress on the stability of a roadway excavated through a coal seam. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 27 (6): 917-927.
[31]. Liu, Q., Sun, L., and Tang, X. (2019). Investigate of the influence of the in-situ stress conditions on the grout penetration process in fractured rocks using the combined finite-discrete element method. Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements. 106: 86-101.
[32]. Ljunggren, C., Chang, Y., Janson, T. and Christiansson, R. (2003). An overview of rock stress measurement methods. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 40 (7-8): 975-989.
[33]. Mahab Ghoods Co. 2013. RMRA-Rock Mechanics Report of Azad PSPP, Phase II.
[34]. Mahab Ghoods Co. 2013. EGRA-Engineering Geology Report of Azad PSPP, Phase II.
[35]. Miao, S.J., Cai, M.F., Guo, Q.F., and Huang, Z.J. (2016). Rock burst prediction based on in-situ stress and energy accumulation theory. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 100 (83): 86-94.
[36]. Mortimer, L., Aydin, A., Simmons, C.T., Heinson, G., and Love, A.J. (2011). The role of in situ stress in determining hydraulic connectivity in a fractured rock aquifer (Australia). Hydrogeology Journal. 19 (7): 1293-1312.
[37]. Oliver Heidbach 2016. WSM Scientific Technical Report 16-01.
[38]. Rutqvist, J., Tsang, C. F. and Stephansson, O. (2000). Uncertainty in the maximum principal stress estimated from hydraulic fracturing measurements due to the presence of the induced fracture. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences. 37 (1-2): 107-120.
[39]. Sano, O., Ito, H., Hirata, A. and Mizuta, Y. (2005). Review of methods of measuring stress and its variations. Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 80, 87-103.
[40]. Serata, S., Sakuma, S., Kikuchi, S. and Mizuta, Y. (1992). Double fracture method of in situ stress measurement in brittle rock. Rock mechanics and rock engineering. 25 (2): 89-108.
[41]. Scheidegger, A.E. (1960). On the connection between tectonic stresses and well fracturing data. Geofisica pura e applicate. 46 (1): 66-76.
[42]. Shahverdiloo, M.R. (2010). Estimation of minimum in situ stress by hydrojacking method case study of Siah bisheh power plant. In ISRM International Symposium on In-Situ Rock Stress. OnePetro.
[43]. Shahverdiloo, M.R., Behnia, M., Anvari, A. and Motlagh, M.A. (2014). Revise of cavern’s axis azimuth in Azad pumped storage project. In ISRM Regional Symposium-EUROCK 2014. International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering.
[44]. WSM 2016-CASMO - Create a Stress Map Online, Iran Stress Map, Available from: http://www.world-stress- map.org/casmo/ [Accessed on 14 March 2020].
[45]. Xiao, Y.X., Feng, X.T., Hudson, J.A., Chen, B.R., Feng, G.L. and Liu, J.P. (2016). ISRM suggested method for in-situ microseismic monitoring of the fracturing process in rock masses. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering. 49 (1): 343-369.
[46]. Zang, A. and Stephansson, O. (2009). Stress field of the Earth's crust. Springer Science and Business Media.
[47]. Zoback, M.D. and Haimson, B.C. (1982). Status of the hydraulic fracturing method for in-situ stress measurements. In The 23rd US Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS). American Rock Mechanics Association. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 442 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 527 |
||