Development of a New Method in Exergy Analysis of a CSP Plant | ||
| Renewable Energy Research and Applications | ||
| دوره 5، شماره 2، مهر 2024، صفحه 243-258 اصل مقاله (1.34 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Article | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22044/rera.2023.13426.1239 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Moslem Akbari Vakilabadi* 1؛ Sadegh Nikbakht Naserabad2؛ Alireza Binesh1 | ||
| 1Faculty of Naval Aviation, Malek Ashtar University of technology, Iran. | ||
| 2Energy Engineering Department, Faculty of Gas and Petroleum, Yasouj University, Gachsaran, Iran. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| In this paper, it is determined exactly how much of the loss of exergy in a specify component is concerning the own component and how much of the exergy loss is due to the effects of the rest of the components on that component. In this new method of exergy analysis, at first, the exergy loss in a component is classified as avoid. /unavoid categories. With this classification, it is possible to understand what quantity of the exergy loss of a component is eliminated by optimizing that component and how much of the exergy dissipation can never be eliminated and is related to the nature of the component. In the next classification, by categorizing the exergy loss into endo./exo., we can find out how much of the exergy destruction is due to the non-optimality of other components and has nothing to do with the component itself. Finally, the categories are divided into avoid-endo, unavoid-endo, avoid-exo and avoid-enxo. By performing this new method, the results demonstrate that the highest exergy destruction (1.976 MW) happens in the evaporator, 68% of which is unavoid-endo. exergy loss. The highest avoid. exergy loss relates to low pressure turbine (0.5791 MW). It is shown that optimizing of surrounding components of deaerator, economizers, and evaporators has a greater effect on decreasing the exergy dissipation of these own components, and the most Avoid. exergy destruction is in heat exchangers, pumps, condensers, turbines, expansion valves, reheaters, and superheaters. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Advanced exergy analysis؛ Solar power plant؛ Endo./Exo. exergy loss؛ Avoid./Unavoid. exergy loss | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] A. Mehrpanahi, S. Nikbakht Naserabad, and G. Ahmadi. Multi-objective linear regression based optimization of full repowering a single pressure steam power plant. Energy. 179 (2019) 1017-1035.
[2] M.A. Vakilabadi, M. Bidi, A. Najafi, and M.H. Ahmadi. Exergy analysis of a hybrid solar‐fossil fuel power plant. Energy Science & Engineering. 7 (2019) 146-61.
[3] M.A. Vakilabadi, M. Bidi, and A. Najafi. Energy, Exergy analysis and optimization of solar thermal power plant with adding heat and water recovery system. Energy conversion and management. 171 (2018) 1639-50.
[4] M. Akbari Vakilabadi, M. Bidi, A. Najafi, and M.H. Ahmadi. Energy, exergy analysis and performance evaluation of a vacuum evaporator for solar thermal power plant zero liquid discharge systems. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 139 (2020) 1275-90.
[5] A. Saedi, A. Jahangiri, M. Ameri, and F. Asadi. Feasibility study and 3E analysis of blowdown heat recovery in a combined cycle power plant for utilization in Organic Rankine Cycle and greenhouse heating. Energy. 260 (2022) 125065.
[6] M. Akbari Vakilabadi, A. Binesh, and M. Monfared. Hydrodynamic Behavior of Biomass Micro-Particles in Counter-Flow Combustion of Dust Clouds. Renewable Energy Research and Applications. 4 (2023) 55-66.
[7] M. Bidabadi, M.A. Vakilabadi, A. Esmaeilnejad. Strain rate effect on microorganic dust flame in a premixed counterflow. Heat Transfer Research. 46 (2015.
[8] T. Koroglu, O.S. Sogut. Conventional and advanced exergy analyses of a marine steam power plant. Energy. 163 (2018) 392-403.
[9] M. Elhelw and K.S. Al Dahma. Utilizing exergy analysis in studying the performance of steam power plant at two different operation mode. Applied Thermal Engineering. 150 (2019) 285-93.
[10] L. Cai, Y. Fu, Z. Cheng, Y. Xiang, and Y. Guan. Advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analyses to evaluate the economy of LNG oxy-fuel combined cycle power plant. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 10 (2022) 108387.
[11] Y. Cao, F. Rostamian, M. Ebadollahi, M. Bezaatpour, and H. Ghaebi. Advanced exergy assessment of a solar absorption power cycle. Renewable Energy. 183 (2022) 561-74.
[12] L. Anetor, E.E. Osakue, and C. Odetunde. Classical and advanced exergy-based analysis of a 750 MW steam power plant. Australian Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 20 (2022) 448-68.
[13] O.R. Altarawneh, A.A. Alsarayreh, M. Ala'a, M.J. Al-Kheetan, and S.S. Alrwashdeh. Energy and exergy analyses for a combined cycle power plant in Jordan. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering. 31 (2022) 101852.
[14] A. Basem, M. Moawed, M.H. Abbood, and W.M. El-Maghlany. The energy and exergy analysis of a combined parabolic solar dish–steam power plant. Renewable Energy Focus. 41 (2022) 55-68.
[15] Y. Dai, J. Wang, and L. Gao. Exergy analysis, parametric analysis and optimization for a novel combined power and ejector refrigeration cycle. applied thermal engineering. 29 (2009) 1983-90.
[16] H. Montazerinejad, E. Fakhimi, S. Ghandehariun, and P. Ahmadi. Advanced exergy analysis of a PEM fuel cell with hydrogen energy storage integrated with organic Rankine cycle for electricity generation. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments. 51 (2022) 101885.
[17] M. Song, Y. Zhuang, L. Zhang, C. Wang, J. Du, and S. Shen. Advanced exergy analysis for the solid oxide fuel cell system combined with a kinetic-based modeling pre-reformer. Energy Conversion and Management. 245 (2021) 114560.
[18] Y. Şöhret, E. Açıkkalp, A. Hepbasli, and T.H. Karakoc. Advanced exergy analysis of an aircraft gas turbine engine: splitting exergy destructions into parts. Energy. 90 (2015) 1219-28.
[19] J. Sheng, M. Voldsund, and I.S. Ertesvåg. Advanced exergy analysis of the oil and gas processing plant on an offshore platform: A thermodynamic cycle approach. Energy Reports. 9 (2023) 820-32.
[20] Y. Tian, T. Zhang, N. Xie, Z. Dong, Z. Yu, M. Lyu et al. Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of large-scale adiabatic compressed air energy storage system. Journal of Energy Storage. 57 (2023) 106165.
[21] A. Ustaoglu, H. Torlaklı, A. Ergün, E. Erdoğmuş, and M.E. Akay. Advanced exergy analysis of an integrated solid waste fueled cogeneration system based on organic Rankine Cycle for different working fluids. Energy Conversion and Management. 270 (2022) 116294.
[22] X. Zhong, T. Chen, X. Sun, J. Song, and J. Zeng. Conventional and advanced exergy analysis of a novel wind-to-heat system. Energy. 261 (2022) 125267.
[23] M. Ezzat and I. Dincer. Energy and exergy analyses of a novel ammonia combined power plant operating with gas turbine and solid oxide fuel cell systems. Energy. 194 (2020) 116750.
[24] H. Yan, M. Liu, D. Chong, C. Wang, and J. Yan. Dynamic performance and control strategy comparison of a solar-aided coal-fired power plant based on energy and exergy analyses. Energy. 236 (2021) 121515.
[25] J. Zueco, D. López-Asensio, F. Fernández, and L.M. López-González. Exergy analysis of a steam-turbine power plant using thermocombustion. Applied Thermal Engineering. 180 (2020) 115812.
[26] A. Kumar, K. Nikam, and A.K. Behura. An exergy analysis of a 250 MW thermal power plant. Renewable Energy Research and Applications. 1 (2020) 197-204.
[27] S. Zhang, M. Liu, Y. Zhao, K. Zhang, J. Liu, and J. Yan. Thermodynamic analysis on a novel bypass steam recovery system for parabolic trough concentrated solar power plants during start-up processes. Renewable Energy. 198 (2022) 973-83.
[28] S. Zhang, M. Liu, Y. Zhao, J. Liu, and J. Yan. Energy and exergy analyses of a parabolic trough concentrated solar power plant using molten salt during the start-up process. Energy. 254 (2022) 124480.
[29] Y. Zhao, M. Liu, J. Song, C. Wang, J. Yan, and C.N. Markides. Advanced exergy analysis of a Joule-Brayton pumped thermal electricity storage system with liquid-phase storage. Energy Conversion and Management. 231 (2021) 113867.
[30] K. Maghsoudi Mehrabani, A. Mehrpanahi, V. Rouhani, and S. Nikbakht Naserabad. Study of the effect of using duct burner on the functional parameters of the two repowered cycles through exergy analysis. Thermal Science. 2 (6 Part B) (2017) 3011-3023.
[31] K. Maghsoudi Mehrabani, A. Mehrpanahi, V. Rouhani, and S. Nikbakht Naserabad. Using two types of heat recovery steam generator for full repowering a steam power plant and its analysis by exergy method. Indian Journal of Scientific Research. 1(2) (2014), 183-198.
[32] T. Morosuk and G. Tsatsaronis. Advanced exergy analysis for chemically reacting systems–application to a simple open gas-turbine system. International Journal of Thermodynamics. 12 (2009) 105-11.
[33] A. Kolios, S. Paganini, and S. Proia. Development of thermodynamic cycles for concentrated solar power plants. International Journal of Sustainable Energy. 32 (2013) 296-314. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,301 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 666 |
||