Bioflotation and Bioleaching as an Alternative Method for Desulphurization and Ash Reduction in Tabas Coal | ||
| Journal of Mining and Environment | ||
| مقاله 11، دوره 15، شماره 2، تیر 2024، صفحه 581-595 اصل مقاله (4.72 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22044/jme.2023.13127.2387 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammadreza Shahbazi1؛ Hadi Abdollahi* 2؛ Sied Ziaeddin Shafaei1؛ Ziaeddin Pourkarimi3؛ Sajjad Jannesar Malakooti4؛ Ehsan Ebrahimi1 | ||
| 1School of Mining Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2School of Mining Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran 1439957131, Iran | ||
| 3Iran Mineral Processing Research Center (IMPRC), Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4Tabas Coal Mines Complex (TCMC), Iranian Mines & Mining Industries Development & Renovation (IMIDRO), Tabas Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Tabas coal possesses favorable plastometric properties that make it suitable for use in metallurgical industries as coking coal. However, its high sulfur content, which stands at approximately 2%, poses a significant environmental pollution risk. Additionally, reducing ash content to below 10% is a critical objective of this study to prevent a decline in coal's thermal efficiency in the metallurgical industries. This research work investigates the removal of sulfur and ash from Tabas coal samples using the biological methods including bioflotation and bioleaching. Initially, a combination of mesophilic bacteria including Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, and Leptosprillium ferrooxidans were employed in the bioflotation method to detain pyrite sulfur in the Tabas coal samples. The highest reduction percentages of pyrite sulfur and ash were equal to 62% and 54.18%, respectively. In the next stage, bioleaching experiments were conducted, the effect of the test time, percentage of bacteria by volume, percentage of coal solids, and absence of bacteria on the amount of sulfur and ash removal was investigated. The test time emerged as the most critical factor. The best sulfur removal was achieved using bioleaching, with a maximum removal of 72.43%, observed for the PE coal sample. Bioflotation also achieved significant sulfur removal, with a maximum removal of 61% observed for the same sample. On the other hand, the best ash removal was achieved using bioflotation, with a maximum removal of 68.98% observed for the PE coal sample, and a maximum removal of 69.34% observed for the B4B2 coal sample using bioleaching. Finally, this research work conducted a comparison of biological methods to determine the amount of sulfur and ash reduction achieved. The results showed that both bioleaching and bioflotation were effective for coal desulfurization and ash removal, with bioleaching performing slightly better for sulfur removal and bioflotation performing slightly better for ash removal. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Tabas coal؛ Coal Biodesulfurization؛ Bioflotation؛ Ash removal؛ Bioleaching | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1]. Alam, H. G., Moghaddam, A. Z., & Omidkhah, M. R. (2008). The influence of process parameters on desulfurization of Mezino coal by HNO 3 / HCl leaching. Fuel Processing Technology, 0, 1–7.
[2]. Amini, E., Hosseini, T. R., Oliazadeh, M., & Kolahdoozan, M. (2009). Application of acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in coal flotation. International Journal of Coal Preparation and Utilization, 29(6), 279–288.
[3]. ASTM D3176-09 Standards, Standard Practice for Ultimate Analysis of Coal and Coke. (2013). American Society for Testing and Materials.
[4]. Aytar, P., Kay, C. M., Mutlu, M. B., & Çabuk, A. (2013). Coal desulfurization with acidithiobacillus ferrivorans, from Balya acidic mine drainage. Energy and Fuels, 27(6), 3090–3098.
[5]. Çabuk, A., Koca, S., & Koca, H. (2014). Isolation and characterization of native microorganism from Turkish lignite and usability at fungal desulphurization, 116, 634–641.
[6]. Dai, S., Jiang, Y., Ward, C. R., Gu, L., Seredin, V. V., Liu, H., Zhou, D., Wang, X., Sun, Y., Zou, J., & Ren, D. (2012). Mineralogical and geochemical compositions of the coal in the Guanbanwusu Mine, Inner Mongolia, China: Further evidence for the existence of an Al (Ga and REE) ore deposit in the Jungar Coalfield. International Journal of Coal Geology, 98, 10–40.
[7]. Duz, M. Z., Saydut, A., Erdogan, S., & Hamamci, C. (2009). Removal of sulfur and ash from coal using molten caustic leaching , a case study from Hazro fields , Turkey, 27(6), 391–400.
[8]. Eghbali, F., & Ehsani, M. (2010). Biodesulfurization of Tabas Coal in Pilot Plant Scale. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 29, 75–78.
[9]. Ehsani, M. (2006). Desulfurization of Tabas Coals Using Chemical Reagents. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, 25.
[10]. El-Midany, A. A., & Abdel-Khalek, M. A. (2014). Reducing sulfur and ash from coal using Bacillus subtilis and Paenibacillus polymyxa. Fuel, 115, 589–595.
[11]. Etemadzadeh, S. S., Emtiazi, G., & Etemadifar, Z. (2016). Heterotrophic Bioleaching of Sulfur, Iron, and Silicon Impurities from Coal by Fusarium oxysporum FE and Exophiala spinifera FM with Growing and Resting Cells. Current Microbiology, 72(6), 707–715.
[12]. Golshani, T., Jorjani, E., Chehreh, C. S., Shafaei, S. Z., & Heidari, N. Y. (2013). International Journal of Mining Science and Technology Modeling and process optimization for microbial desulfurization of coal by using a two-level full factorial design. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 23(2), 261–265.
[13]. He, H., Hong, F.-F., Tao, X.-X., Li, L., Ma, C.-Y., & Zhao, Y.-D. (2012). Biodesulfurization of coal with Acidithiobacillus caldus and analysis of the interfacial interaction between cells and pyrite. Fuel Processing Technology, 101, 73–77.
[14]. Jorjani, E., Chelgani, S. C., & Mesroghli, S. (2008). Application of artificial neural networks to predict chemical desulfurization of Tabas coal, 87, 2727–2734.
[15]. Jorjani, E., Rezai, B., Vossoughi, M., & Osanloo, M. (2004). Desulfurization of Tabas coal with microwave irradiation / peroxyacetic acid washing at 25 , 55 and 85 8 C, 83, 943–949.
[16]. Kiani, M. H., Ahmadi, A., & Zilouei, H. (2014). Biological removal of sulphur and ash from fine-grained high pyritic sulphur coals using a mixed culture of mesophilic microorganisms. Fuel, 131, 89–95.
[17]. Liu, T., Hou, J.-H., & Peng, Y.-L. (2017). Biodesulfurization from the high sulfur coal with a newly isolated native bacterium, Aspergillus sp. DP06. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 36(2), 595–599.
[18]. Malik, A., Dastidar, M. G., & Roychoudhury, P. K. (2001). Biodesulphurization of coal: Effect of pulse feeding and leachate recycle. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 28(1), 49–56.
[19]. Milan, A. D., Ahmadi, A., & Hosseini, S. M. R. (2017). Biodesulfurization of a Coarse-Grained High Sulfur Coal in a Full-Scale Packed-Bed Bioreactor. Solid State Phenomena, 262, 207–210.
[20]. Mishra, S., Pradhan, N., Panda, S., & Akcil, A. (2016). Biodegradation of dibenzothiophene and its application in the production of clean coal. Fuel Processing Technology, 152, 325–342.
[21]. Misra, M., Bukka, K., & Chen, S. (1996). The effect of growth medium of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans on pyrite flotation. Minerals Engineering, 9(2), 157–168.
[22]. San Martín, F., Kracht, W., Vargas, T., & Rudolph, M. (2020). Mechanisms of pyrite biodepression with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in seawater flotation. Minerals Engineering, 145(October 2019), 106067.
[23]. Shahbazi, M., Abdollahi, H., Shafaei, S. Z., Pourkarimi, Z., Jannesar Malakooti, S., Rahimi, M., & Ebrahimi, E. (2022). Desulfurization of Tabas coal using chemical (Meyers, Molten caustic leaching) and biological (bioleaching) methods. International Journal of Mining and Geo-Engineering.
[24]. Subramanian, S., Santhiya, D., & Natarajan, K. A. (2003). Surface modification studies on sulphide minerals using bioreagents. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 72(1–4), 175–188.
[25]. Vijayalakshmi, S. P., & Raichur, A. M. (2002). Bioflocculation of high-ash Indian coals using Paenibacillus polymyxa. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 67(1–4), 199–210.
[26]. Xia, W., & Xie, G. (2017). A technological review of developments in chemical-related desulfurization of coal in the past decade. International Journal of Mineral Processing.
[27]. Xu, J., Liu, X., Song, C., Du, Z., Wang, F., Chen, X., & Zhou, A. (2019). Environmental Effects Biodesulfurization of high sulfur coal from Shanxi : Optimization of the desulfurization parameters of three kinds of bacteria Biodesulfurization of high sulfur coal from Shanxi : Optimization of the desulfurization parameters of thr. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 00(00), 1–19.
[28]. Xu, J., Liu, X., Song, C., Du, Z., Wang, F., Luo, J., Chen, X., & Zhou, A. (2020). Biodesulfurization of high sulfur coal from Shanxi: Optimization of the desulfurization parameters of three kinds of bacteria. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 42(18), 2297–2315.
[29]. Yue, L., Jiao, Y., Wu, L., Rong, H., Fayek, M., & Xie, H. (2020). Evolution and origins of pyrite in sandstone-type uranium deposits, northern Ordos Basin, north-central China, based on micromorphological and compositional analysis. Ore Geology Reviews, 118, 103334. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 375 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 553 |
||