سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود

Devrath, Subhash, Nag, Aditi, Pareek, Sanjeev. (1404). Transforming Mining Regions through Sustainable Redevelopment with Urban Voids and Underground Housing. , 16(4), 1319-1342. doi: 10.22044/jme.2025.15649.3005
Subhash Chandra Devrath; Aditi Nag; Sanjeev Pareek. "Transforming Mining Regions through Sustainable Redevelopment with Urban Voids and Underground Housing". , 16, 4, 1404, 1319-1342. doi: 10.22044/jme.2025.15649.3005
Devrath, Subhash, Nag, Aditi, Pareek, Sanjeev. (1404). 'Transforming Mining Regions through Sustainable Redevelopment with Urban Voids and Underground Housing', , 16(4), pp. 1319-1342. doi: 10.22044/jme.2025.15649.3005
Devrath, Subhash, Nag, Aditi, Pareek, Sanjeev. Transforming Mining Regions through Sustainable Redevelopment with Urban Voids and Underground Housing. , 1404; 16(4): 1319-1342. doi: 10.22044/jme.2025.15649.3005

Transforming Mining Regions through Sustainable Redevelopment with Urban Voids and Underground Housing

Journal of Mining and Environment
مقاله 10، دوره 16، شماره 4، مهر و آبان 2025، صفحه 1319-1342    اصل مقاله (10.2 M)
نوع مقاله: Review Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22044/jme.2025.15649.3005
نویسندگان
Subhash Chandra Devrath؛ Aditi Nag؛ Sanjeev Pareek*
School of Architecture & Design, FoSTA, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur – 303007, Rajasthan, India
چکیده
This paper explores sustainable redevelopment strategies for post-mining regions by integrating urban voids and underground housing solutions. Mining landscapes, often characterized by degraded environments, socio-economic stagnation, and underutilized spaces present significant challenges and opportunities for transformation. Urban voids such as abandoned pits, industrial complexes, and obsolete worker settlements can be repurposed into green infrastructure, public amenities, or residential spaces. Underground housing, leveraging the natural insulation of subsurface environments, offers energy-efficient solutions, while preserving surface land for ecological and communal uses. The research proposes a conceptual framework that combines the adaptive reuse of urban voids with innovative underground housing designs to enhance urban attractiveness, sustainability, and inclusivity. key indexing metrics, including environmental, socio-economic, and urban attractiveness indicators, are developed to evaluate the effectiveness of redevelopment efforts. Case studies from Germany, Belgium, France, and the USA illustrate these strategies' practical applications and transformative potential. The findings emphasize the importance of addressing socio-economic constraints, environmental remediation, and regulatory challenges through participatory planning, innovative governance, and public-private partnerships. The paper concludes by identifying areas for future research, including socio-cultural acceptance of underground housing, region-specific policy frameworks, and advanced remediation technologies. This study provides a comprehensive roadmap for transforming mining regions into vibrant, sustainable, resilient urban environments.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Mining Regions؛ Urban Voids؛ Underground Housing؛ Redevelopment؛ Socio-Economic Impact
مراجع
  • Hajkazemiha, N., Shariat, M., Monavari, M., & Ataei, M. (2021). Evaluation of mine reclamation criteria using Delphi-Fuzzy approach. Journal of Mining and Environment, 12(2), 367-384.
  • Winde, F. (2020). Turning water pollution sources into assets: Exploring innovative options of using abandoned mines for generating and storing renewable energy. Geography, environment, sustainability, 13(2), 6-16.
  • Pareek, S., & Kumar, M. (2024). Factors affecting land value of urban voids in western part of India. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 71(1), 44.
  • Pluta, A. (2017). Urban void as a potential of the contemporary city development. Biblioteka regionalisty, (17), 95-103.
  • Hashem, O. M., Wahba, S. M. E., & Nasr-Eldin, T. I. (2022). Urban voids: Identifying and optimizing urban voids potential as a revitalization source in enhancing developing countries’ city income. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 69, 1-30.
  • Aleha, A., Zahra, S. M., Qureshi, S., Marri, S. A., Siddique, S., & Hussain, S. S. (2023). Urban void as an urban catalyst bridging the gap between the community. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1068897.
  • Romão, J., Kourtit, K., Neuts, B., & Nijkamp, P. (2018). The smart city as a common place for tourists and residents: A structural analysis of the determinants of urban attractiveness. Cities, 78, 67-75.
  • Kourtit, K., Nijkamp, P., & Wahlström, M. H. (2021). How to make cities the home of people–a ‘soul and body’analysis of urban attractiveness. Land use policy, 111, 104734.
  • Devrath, A. S. C. (2016). Potential of Earth Sheltered Buildings for Thermalcomfort. International Journal of Advanced Research and Review (IJARR), 1(10), 88-98.
  • Mahdi, R. M., & Aboud, A. H. (2021, February). Underground housing formation strategies. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1773(1), 012033). IOP Publishing.
  • Lembo, F., Marino, F. P. R., & Calcagno, C. (2011). Semi-underground house models as new concepts for urban sustainable environment. Procedia Engineering, 21, 570-579.
  • Cho, I. S., Heng, C. K., & Trivic, Z. (2015). Re-framing urban space: urban design for emerging hybrid and high-density conditions. Routledge.
  • Nag, A., & Mishra, S. (2024). Sustainable competitive advantage in heritage tourism: Leveraging cultural legacy in a data-driven world. In Review of Technologies and Disruptive Business Strategies, 3, 137-162). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  • Moirongo, B. O. (2002). Urban public space patterns: human distribution and the design of sustainable city centres with reference to Nairobi CBD. Urban Design International, 7, 205-216.
  • AL-Mohannadi, A. S., AL-Mohannadi, M. S., Pokharel, S., Ayari, M. A., & Furlan, R. (2023). Mitigation of urban voids in traditional neighborhoods: The case of the Al-Najada zone in Doha, Qatar. Journal of Urban Management, 12(4), 327-343.
  • Rogerson, C. M., & Rogerson, J. M. (2021). Urban tourism under apartheid: The Johannesburg chapter. Urban tourism in the global south: South African perspectives, 149-172.
  • Rodewald, H. (2022). Creative Frontiers: Germany’s Ruhr Area as a Space of Polyrational Possibility. The Complex City: Social and Built Approaches and Methods, 49-62.
  • Couch, C., Sykes, O., & Börstinghaus, W. (2011). Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency. Progress in planning, 75(1), 1-52.
  • Keough, S. B. (2015). Planning for growth in a natural resource boomtown: Challenges for urban planners in Fort McMurray, Alberta. Urban Geography, 36(8), 1169-1196.
  • Murtagh, R. (2015). Exploring Maboneng as an international urban tourism attraction within Johannesburg.
  • Nag, A., & Mishra, S. (2023). Stakeholders' perception and competitiveness of heritage towns: A systematic literature review. Tourism Management Perspectives, 48, 101156.
  • Nag, A., & Mishra, S. (2024). Exploring Dark Tourism in Mining Heritage: Competitiveness and Ethical Dilemmas. Journal of Mining and Environment, 15(3), 863-887.
  • Bangian, A. H., Ataei, M., Sayadi, A. R., & Gholinegad, A. R. (2011). The application of fuzzy MADM modeling to define optimum post-mining land use for pit area to recognize reclamation costs in open pit mining. Archives of Mining Science, 56(1), 91–116.
  • Alavi, I., Ebrahimabadi, A., & Hamidian, H. (2022). A new technical and economic approach to optimal plant species selection for open-pit mine reclamation process. Journal of Mining and Environment, 13(4), 1091-1105.
  • Bangian, A. H., Ataei, M., Sayadi, A. R., & Gholinegad, A. R. (2011). Fuzzy analytical hierarchy processing to define optimum post-mining land use for pit area to clarify reclamation costs. Mineral Resources Management (Gospodarka Surowcami Mineralnymi), 56(2), 145-168.
  • Evans, D., Stephenson, M., & Shaw, R. (2009). The present and future use of ‘land’below ground. Land Use Policy, 26, S302-S316.
  • Walliss, J., & Kok, K. (2014). New interpretative strategies for geotourism: an exploration of two Australian mining sites. Journal of tourism and cultural change, 12(1), 33-49.
  • Cui, J., & Lin, D. (2016). Utilisation of underground pedestrian systems for urban sustainability. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 55, 194-204.
  • Tranzatto, M., Mascarich, F., Bernreiter, L., Godinho, C., Camurri, M., Khattak, S., ... & Alexis, K. (2022). Cerberus: Autonomous legged and aerial robotic exploration in the tunnel and urban circuits of the darpa subterranean challenge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.07067, 3.
  • Menéndez, J., Ordóñez, A., Álvarez, R., & Loredo, J. (2019). Energy from closed mines: Underground energy storage and geothermal applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 108, 498-512.
  • Manaugh, G. (2016). Global undergrounds: Exploring cities within. Reaktion Books.
  • Beveridge, R., Kip, M., & Oevermann, H. (2022). From wastelands to waiting lands: Retrieving possibility from the voids of Berlin. City, 26(2-3), 281-303.
  • Whitbread-Abrutat, P. (2024). A mine ends. Then what? Some reflections on best practice. In Mine Closure 2024: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mine Closure, 3-16. Australian Centre for Geomechanics.
  • Ruming, K., McGuirk, P., & Mee, K. (2021). What lies beneath? The material agency and politics of the underground in urban regeneration. Geoforum, 126, 159-170.
  • Labbé, M. (2016). Architecture of underground spaces: From isolated innovations to connected urbanism. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 55, 153-175.
  • Colomb, C. (2012). Pushing the urban frontier: Temporary uses of space, city marketing, and the creative city discourse in 2000s Berlin. Journal of urban affairs, 34(2), 131-152.
  • Earney, F. C., & Green, J. E. (1977). Mining, planning, and the urban environment. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 7(1), 1-89.
  • Li, H. (2013). An Integrated Strategy for Sustainable Underground Urbanization, EPFL.
  • Pouresmaieli, M., Qarahasanlou, A. N., & Ataei, M. (2024). An evolution in sustainable development: Integrating new semi-quantitative assessment model with strategic management (Insights from the mineral sector). Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 10, 100983.
  • Salehi, S., Pouresmaieli, M., & Qarahasanlou, A. N. (2025). A sustainable way to prevent oral diseases caused by heavy metals with phytoremediation. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 101106.
  • Pouresmaieli, M., Ataei, M., Qarahasanlou, A. N., & Barabadi, A. (2024). Corporate social responsibility in complex systems based on sustainable development. Resources Policy, 90, 104818.
  • Pouresmaieli, M., Ataei, M., Nouri Qarahasanlou, A., & Barabadi, A. (2024). Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods for Sustainable Decision-making in the Mining Industry (A Comprehensive Study). Journal of Mining and Environment, 15(2), 683-706.
  • Nag, A. (2025). Stakeholders’ perception influence in competitive heritage place-making: case study India. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning, 1-76.
  • Pouresmaieli, M., Ataei, M., Qarahasanlou, A. N., & Barabadi, A. (2024). Building ecological literacy in mining communities: A sustainable development perspective. Case Studies in Chemical and Environmental Engineering, 9, 100554.
  • Pouresmaieli, M., Ataei, M., & Qarahasanlou, A. N. (2023). A scientometrics view on sustainable development in surface mining: Everything from the beginning. Resources policy, 82, 103410.
  • Nag, A. (2024). Local development and tourism competitiveness: Analyzing the economic impact of heritage tourism initiatives. In Gastronomic Sustainability Solutions for Community and Tourism Resilience, 160-190. IGI Global.
  • Pouresmaieli, M., Ataei, M., Forouzandeh, P., Azizollahi, P., & Mahmoudifard, M. (2022). Recent progress on sustainable phytoremediation of heavy metals from soil. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 10(5), 108482.
  • Pouresmaieli, M., & Osanloo, M. (2019, November). Establishing a model to reduce the risk of premature mine closure. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 362(1), 012005. IOP Publishing.
  • Nag, A., & Rathore, A. S. (2025). Balancing Bias and Sustainability in Heritage Tourism. In Destination Branding and Bias in Ecotourism, 217-266. IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
  • Nag, A., & Rathore, A. S. (2024). Digital Innovation and Destination Competitiveness. Journal of Mining and Environment.
  • Talento, K., Amado, M., & Kullberg, J. C. (2020). Quarries: From abandoned to renewed places. Land, 9(5), 136.
  • Dey, S. D., & Singh, R. (2021). Mapping precarious energy geographies: Exploring the lived experience of coal mining in Jharia, India. Energy Research & Social Science, 82, 102298.
  • Winde, F., Kaiser, F., & Erasmus, E. (2017). Exploring the use of deep level gold mines in South Africa for underground pumped hydroelectric energy storage schemes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 668-682.
  • Francaviglia, R. V. (1997). Hard places: Reading the landscape of America's historic mining districts. University of Iowa Press.
  • Storm, A. (2014). Post-industrial landscape scars. Springer.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 134
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 152