Effect of Soil Physical Parameters and Foam Injection Ratio on Soil Shear Strength in EPB Tunneling | ||
| Journal of Mining and Environment | ||
| مقاله 17، دوره 17، شماره 3، مرداد و شهریور 2026، صفحه 1077-1088 اصل مقاله (3.83 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22044/jme.2025.15723.3026 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Mohammad Mohammadi؛ Saeed Mahdavi* ؛ Raheb Bagherpour | ||
| Department of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| EPB machines have been the most applicable for tunneling in urban areas over the last decades. To increase soil consistency, reduce machine torque, and stabilize the tunnel face in EPB tunneling, foam injection is essential. The shear strength of the soil in the EPB chamber affects the machine torque. Therefore, in this research, the effects of soil water content, clay percentage, foam injection ratio, and soil granular size on the shear strength are investigated. The Isfahan subway line 2 in Iran was selected as a case study. Based on the results of the vane shear test, the shear strength of soil first increases rapidly and then gradually with an increase in soil particle size, and particle size is the most significant parameter that controls the shear strength of soil samples. The result of the analysis also indicates that increasing FIR up to 40% can lead to a 44% reduction in soil shear strength and, as a result, a decrease in excavation power. Increasing the clay percentage from 20 to 40 percent reduces the soil shear strength by up to 36 percent. The lowest shear strength of soil is achieved when the water content is 5 percent. By increasing the FIR from 10 to 20 percent, the shear strength of samples decreases rapidly and remains constant when the FIR rises up to 40 percent. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Isfahan subway line 2؛ EPB tunneling؛ FIR؛ Water content؛ Particle size distribution | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Avunduk, E. M. R. E., Copur, H., Tolouei, S., Tumac, D., Balci, C., Bilgin, N., & Shaterpour–Mamaghani, A. (2021). Possibility of using torvane shear testing device for soil conditioning optimization. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 107, 103665.
[2] Avunduk, E., & Copur, H. (2018). Empirical modeling for predicting excavation performance of EPB TBM based on soil properties. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 71, 340-353.
[3] Avunduk, E., & Copur, H. (2019). Effect of clogging on EPB TBM performance: a case study in Akfirat waste water tunnel, Turkey. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 37, 4789-4801.
[4] Jancsecz, S., Krause, R., & Langmaack, L. (1999). Advantages of soil conditioning in shield tunnelling: experiences of LRTS Izmir. Challenges for the 21st Century, Alten et al (eds), 865-875.
[5] Langmaack, L. (2000). Advanced technology of soil conditioning in EPB shield tunnelling. proceedings of North American tunneling, 2000, 525-542.
[6] Wei, Y., Yang, Y., Tao, M., Wang, D., & Jie, Y. (2020). Earth pressure balance shield tunneling in sandy gravel deposits: a case study of application of soil conditioning. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 79, 5013-5030.
[7] Peila, D., Oggeri, C., & Borio, L. (2009). Using the slump test to assess the behavior of conditioned soil for EPB tunneling. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 15(3), 167-174.
[8] EFNARC, (2005). Specification and guidelines for the use of specialist products for mechanized tunnelling (TBM) in soft ground and hard rock. European Federation.
[9] Copur, H., Avunduk, E. M. R. E., Tolouei, S., Tumac, D., Balci, C., Bilgin, N., & Mamaghani, A. S. (2020). Possibility of using vane shear testing device for optimizing soil conditioning. In Tunnels and Underground Cities: Engineering and Innovation Meet Archaeology, Architecture and Art (pp. 1954-1963). CRC Press.
[10] Galli, M., & Thewes, M. (2019). Rheological characterisation of foam-conditioned sands in EPB tunneling. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 17(1), 145-160.
[11] Budach, C. (2012). Untersuchungen zum erweiterten Einsatz von Erddruckschilden in grobkörnigem Lockergestein. (In German with English abstract).
[12] Budach, C., & Thewes, M. (2015). Application ranges of EPB shields in coarse ground based on laboratory research. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 50, 296-304.
[13] de Oliveira, D. G. G., Thewes, M., Diederichs, M. S., & Langmaack, L. (2018). Proposed methodology for clogging evaluation in EPB machines. In Proceedings of the World Tunnel Congress. Dubai.
[14] de Oliveira, D. G. G., Thewes, M., & Diederichs, M. S. (2019). EPB machine excavation of mixed soils–Laboratory characterisation. Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 12(4), 373-385.
[15] Peila, D., Picchio, A., Martinelli, D., & Negro, E. D. (2016). Laboratory tests on soil conditioning of clayey soil. Acta Geotechnica, 11(5), 1061-1074.
[16] Quebaud, S., Sibai, M., & Henry, J. P. (1998). Use of chemical foam for improvements in drilling by earth-pressure balanced shields in granular soils. Tunnelling and underground space technology, 13(2), 173-180.
[17] Thewes, M., & Budach, C. (2010). Soil conditioning with foam during EPB tunnelling. Geomechanics and Tunnelling, 3(3), 256-267.
[18] Vinai, R., Oggeri, C., & Peila, D. (2008). Soil conditioning of sand for EPB applications: Laboratory research. Tunnelling and underground space technology, 23(3), 308-317.
[19] Bezuijen, A., Schaminee, P. E. L., & Kleinjan, J. A. (1999). Additive testing for earth pressure balance shields. In Twelfth European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (Proceedings) The Netherlands Society of Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering; Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management; AP van den Berg Machinefabriek; Fugro NV; GeoDelft; Holland Railconsult (No. Volume 3).
[20] Galli, M. (2016). Rheological characterisation of earth-pressure-balance (EPB) support medium composed of non-cohesive soils and foam.
[21] de Oliveira, D. G., Thewes, M., & Diederichs, M. S. (2019). Clogging and flow assessment of cohesive soils for EPB tunnelling: Proposed laboratory tests for soil characterisation. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 94, 103110.
[22] Psomas, S., & Psomas, S. (2001). Properties of foam/sand mixtures for tunnelling applications (Doctoral dissertation, University of Oxford).
[23] Zumsteg, R., Plötze, M., & Puzrin, A. (2014). Reduction of the clogging potential of clays: new chemical applications and novel quantification approaches. In Bio-and Chemo-Mechanical Processes in Geotechnical Engineering: Géotechnique Symposium in Print 2013 (pp. 44-54). ICE Publishing.
[24] Mori, L. (2016). Advancing understanding of the relationship between soil conditioning and earth pressure balance tunnel boring machine chamber and shield annulus behavior. Colorado School of Mines.
[25] Pena Duarte, M., & Duarte, M. P. (2007). Foam as a soil conditioner in tunnelling: physical and mechanical properties of conditioned sands (Doctoral dissertation, Oxford University, UK).
[26] Messerklinger, S., Zumsteg, R., & Puzrin, A. M. (2011). A new pressurized vane shear apparatus. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 34(2), 112-121.
[27] Meng, Q., Qu, F., & Li, S. (2011). Experimental investigation on viscoplastic parameters of conditioned sands in earth pressure balance shield tunneling. Journal of mechanical science and technology, 25, 2259-2266.
[28] Spagnoli, G., Stanjek, H., & Sridharan, A. (2018). Some observations considering undrained shear strength, liquidity index, and fluid/solid ratio of mono-mineralic clays with water–ethanol mixtures. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 55(7), 1048-1053.
[29] Hu, W., & Rostami, J. (2021). Evaluating rheology of conditioned soil using commercially available surfactants (foam) for simulation of material flow through EPB machine. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 112, 103881.
[30] Lee, H., Kwak, J., Choi, J., Hwang, B., & Choi, H. (2022). A lab-scale experimental approach to evaluate rheological properties of foam-conditioned soil for EPB shield tunnelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 128, 104667.
[31] Lee, H., Kim, H. K., Hwang, B., Yoon, Y., & Choi, H. (2024). Coupled DEM-FDM numerical model for EPB shield tunnelling simulation with foam conditioning. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 147, 105718.
[32] Jin, G., Lu, Y., Shiau, J. S., Huang, M., Lai, F., & Feng, M. (2025). Consequence and interaction of foaming agent components on soil conditioning of gravel-clay strata for EPB shield tunnelling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 157, 106364.
[33] Bai, X. D., Wu, B., & Cheng, W. C. (2023). Comprehensive loess soil adhesion properties assessment: Insights from laboratory tests and atomic scale analyses. In Expanding Underground-Knowledge and Passion to Make a Positive Impact on the World (pp. 1767-1774). CRC Press.
[34] Carigi, A., Todaro, C., Martinelli, D., & Peila, D. (2022). A More Comprehensive Way to Analyze Foam Stability for EPB Tunnelling—Introduction of a Mathematical Characterization. Geosciences, 12(5), 191.
[35] Chen, Z., Bezuijen, A., Fang, Y., & de Oliveira, D. G. G. (2023). Assessment methodology for clogging estimation and soil conditioning in EPB shields. In Expanding Underground-Knowledge and Passion to Make a Positive Impact on the World (pp. 1209-1216). CRC Press.
[36] Cui, J., Xu, G., Fang, Y., Chen, Z., Yao, Z., Tao, L., & Qu, L. (2023). Experimental assessment of Soil/metal interface adhesion behaviours of EPB shield Machines. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 131, 104835.
[37] Salmanpour, F., Chakeri, H., Chehreghani, S., & Soula, H. A. (2023). Effect of soil conditioning on the permeability of coarse-grained soil in mechanized tunnelling. Heliyon, 9(12).
[38] Shetty, R., Eisenman, A., Lopez, S., & Mooney, M. A. (2023). Validity of stickiness and consistency index in assessment of cutterhead clogging potential of cohesive soils. In Expanding Underground-Knowledge and Passion to Make a Positive Impact on the World (pp. 1453-1461). CRC Press.
[39] El Souwaissi, N., Djeran-Maigre, I., Boulange, L., & Trottin, J. L. (2023). Effects of the physical characteristics of foams on conditioned soil’s flow behavior: a case study. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 137, 105111.
[40] Hu, W., & Rostami, J. (2021). Evaluating rheology of conditioned soil using commercially available surfactants (foam) for simulation of material flow through EPB machine. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 112, 103881.
[41] Huang, H., Sun, Q., Xu, T., & Zhou, W. (2024). Mechanism analysis of foam penetration in EPB shield tunnelling with a focus on FER and soil particle size. Underground Space, 17, 170-187.
[42] Lu, Y., Huang, M., Zhou, Q., Wang, B., Wei, W., & Chen, J. (2024). On recycling earth pressure balance shield muck with residual foaming agent: defoaming and antifoaming investigations. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(5), 8046-8060.
[43] Fang, Y., Chen, Z., Song, T., Wang, K., & Zhou, K. (2023). New clogging potential assessment method for conditioned soil based on modified pullout and direct shear tests. Acta Geotechnica, 18(6), 3307-3322.
[44] Zhuo, B., Fang, Y., Zhu, M., Yubo, W., Yuxiang, Y., & Gongyun, X. (2023). Combined conditioning of dispersant and foam agent for the soil with different clay minerals: an experimental study. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 82(7), 248.
[45] The Isfahan subway line 2 geotechnical report, (2019). Isfahan Urban and Suburban Railway Organization
[46] Taguchi, G., (1987). System of experimental design; engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize costs. New York: UNIPUB, Kraus International Publications. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 321 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 33 |
||