Explainable Ensemble Machine Learning Model for Blast-Induced Noise Prediction | ||
| Journal of Mining and Environment | ||
| مقاله 7، دوره 17، شماره 2، خرداد و تیر 2026، صفحه 501-518 اصل مقاله (1.59 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: Original Research Paper | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22044/jme.2025.16351.3195 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Clement Kweku Arthur* 1؛ Yao Yevenyo Ziggah2؛ Victor Amoako Temeng3 | ||
| 1Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Minerals Technology, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Western Region, GhanaUniversity of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Western Region, Ghana | ||
| 2Department of Geomatic Engineering, Faculty of Geosciences and Environmental Studies, University of Mines and Technology, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Western Region, GhanaUniversity of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Western Region, Ghana | ||
| 3Department of Mining Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Minerals Technology, University of Mines and Technology, Tarkwa, Western Region, Ghana | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Blast-induced noise is one of the most persistent environmental challenges in surface mining, posing significant health risks to workers and nearby communities. Accurate prediction of noise levels prior to blasting is essential for mitigating its adverse impacts. This study proposes an explainable ensemble machine learning framework for predicting blast-induced noise using data from an open-pit gold mine in Ghana. Four ensemble models namely: Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Gradient Boosting, Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), and Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), were developed and evaluated using a comprehensive dataset of 324 blasting events. Performances of the developed models were assessed using coefficient of determination (R²), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) and coefficient of the variation of the root mean squared error (CVRMSE), with XGBoost emerging as the best-performing model (R² = 1.0000, RMSE = 0.0005, MAE = 0.0004, MAPE = 0.0010, CVRMSE = 0.0013). To address the black-box nature of ensemble method, Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed, offering both global and local interpretability. SHAP analysis identified the distance from the blast site to the monitoring point as the most influential factor. This integrative approach not only enhances predictive accuracy but also improves model transparency, supporting sustainable mining practices aligned with United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3 and 15. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| Shapley additive explanations؛ sustainable mining؛ random search؛ Interpretability, environmental impact assessment | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1]. Paik, C. B., Pei, M., & Oghalai, J. S. (2022). Review of blast noise and the auditory system. Hearing Research, 425, 108459.
[2]. Das, T., Holland, P., Ahmed, M., Husain, L., Ahmed, M., & Husain, L. (2021). Sustainable development goal 3: Good health and well-being. In South-East Asia Eye Health: Systems, Practices, and Challenges (pp. 61-78). Springer.
[3]. Klein, M. (2020). SDG 15: life on land. Jean Monnet Sustainable Development Goals Network Policy Brief Series, 1, 1-6.
[4]. Temeng, V. A., Ziggah, Y. Y., & Arthur, C. K. (2021). Blast-induced noise level prediction model based on brain inspired emotional neural network. Journal of Sustainable Mining, 20(1), 28-38.
[5]. Ziggah, Y. Y., Temeng, V. A., & Arthur, C. K. (2023). A new synergetic model of neighbourhood component analysis and artificial intelligence method for blast-induced noise prediction. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 9(3), 3483-3502.
[6]. Rincy, T. N., & Gupta, R. (2020, February). Ensemble learning techniques and its efficiency in machine learning: A survey. In 2nd international conference on data, engineering and applications (IDEA) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
[7]. Ni, L., Wang, D., Wu, J., Wang, Y., Tao, Y., Zhang, J., & Liu, J. (2020). Streamflow forecasting using extreme gradient boosting model coupled with Gaussian mixture model. Journal of Hydrology, 586, 124901.
[8]. Osman, A. I. A., Ahmed, A. N., Chow, M. F., Huang, Y. F., & El-Shafie, A. (2021). Extreme gradient boosting (Xgboost) model to predict the groundwater levels in Selangor Malaysia. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(2), 1545-1556.
[9]. Jarajapu, D. C., Rathinasamy, M., Agarwal, A., & Bronstert, A. (2022). Design flood estimation using extreme Gradient Boosting-based on Bayesian optimization. Journal of Hydrology, 613, 128341.
[10]. Ragam, P., Komalla, A. R., & Kanne, N. (2022). Estimation of blast-induced peak particle velocity using ensemble machine learning algorithms: A case study. Noise & Vibration Worldwide, 53(7-8), 404-413.
[11]. Hosseini, S., Pourmirzaee, R., Armaghani, D. J., & Sabri Sabri, M. M. (2023). Prediction of ground vibration due to mine blasting in a surface lead–zinc mine using machine learning ensemble techniques. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 6591- 6610.
[12]. Chandrahas, N. S., Choudhary, B. S., Teja, M. V., Venkataramayya, M. S., & Prasad, N. K. (2022). XG boost algorithm to simultaneous prediction of rock fragmentation and induced ground vibration using unique blast data. Applied Sciences, 12(10), 5269.
[13]. Gu, Z., Xiong, X., Yang, C., Cao, M., & Xu, C. (2024). Research on prediction of PPV in open pit mine used on intelligent hybrid model of extreme gradient boosting. Journal of Environmental Management, 371, 123248.
[14]. Ahmad, F., Samui, P., & Mishra, S. S. (2024). Probabilistic slope stability analysis using subset simulation enhanced by ensemble machine learning techniques. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 10(2), 2133-2158.
[15]. Yadav, D. K., Chattopadhyay, S., Tripathy, D. P., Mishra, P., & Singh, P. (2025). Enhanced slope stability prediction using ensemble machine learning techniques. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 7302.
[16]. Soltanalinejad, S., & Moomivand, H. (2024). Development of a novel empirical approach to control overbreak, surface quality, and slope angle of benches following blasting. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 62, 1-22.
[17]. Angelov, P. P., Soares, E. A., Jiang, R., Arnold, N. I., & Atkinson, P. M. (2021). Explainable artificial intelligence: an analytical review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 11(5), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1424
[18]. Gadde, N., Mohapatra, A., Tallapragada, D., Mody, K., Vijay, N., & Gottumukhala, A. (2024). Explainable AI for dynamic ensemble models in high-stakes decision-making. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 13, 1170-1176.
[19]. Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138-52160.
[20]. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S. I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 4765–4774.
[21]. Kuhn, M., & Johnson, K. (2013). Applied predictive modelling. Springer.
[22]. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016, August). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 785-794).
[23]. Friedman, J. H. (2001). Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Annals of Statistics, 29(5), 1189-1232.
[24]. Wang, T., Hu, S., & Jiang, Y. (2021). Predicting shared-car use and examining nonlinear effects using gradient boosting regression trees. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(12), 893-907.
[25]. Singh, U., Rizwan, M., Alaraj, M., & Alsaidan, I. (2021). A machine learning-based gradient boosting regression approach for wind power production forecasting: A step towards smart grid environments. Energies, 14(16), 5196.
[26]. Prokhorenkova, L., Gusev, G., Vorobev, A., Dorogush, A. V., & Gulin, A. (2018). CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 31, 1-23.
[27]. Antonini, A. S., Tanzola, J., Asiain, L., Ferracutti, G. R., Castro, S. M., Bjerg, E. A., & Ganuza, M. L. (2024). Machine Learning model interpretability using SHAP values: Application to Igneous Rock Classification task. Applied Computing and Geosciences, 23, 100178.
[28]. Rácz, A., Bajusz, D., & Héberger, K. (2021). Effect of dataset size and train/test split ratios in QSAR/QSPR multiclass classification. Molecules, 26(4), 1111.
[29]. Kulkarni, S. (2023, November). Impact of various data splitting ratios. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering (ICETE 2023) (pp. 96–104). Springer Nature.
[30]. Brantson, E. T., Ju, B., Omisore, B. O., Wu, D., Selase, A. E., & Liu, N. (2018). Development of machine learning predictive models for history matching tight gas carbonate reservoir production profiles. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 15(5), 2235-2251.
[31]. Bergstra, J., & Bengio, Y. (2012). Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. The journal of Machine Learning Research, 13(1), 281-305.
[32]. Alshboul, O., Shehadeh, A., Almasabha, G., & Almuflih, A. S. (2022). Extreme gradient boosting-based machine learning approach for green building cost prediction. Sustainability, 14(11), 6651-6670. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116651
[33]. Chugh, A. (2020). MAE, MSE, RMSE, coefficient of determination, adjusted R squared—which metric is better?. Medium.
[34]. Long, M. (2014). Environmental noise. In: M. Long (Ed), Architectural Acoustics (pp. 175-219), Academic Press.
[35]. Hannah, L. (2006). Ground, terrain and structure effects on sound propagation. New Zealand Acoustics, 20(3): 22-29.
[36]. Hannah, L. (2006). Wind and temperature effects on sound propagation. New Zealand Acoustics, 20(2): 22-29. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 318 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 62 |
||